(PC) Dahl v. Wasco State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20231:22-cv-01153California1,077 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRADLEY WAYNE DAHL, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01153-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY

WASCO STATE PRISON, et al., COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Bradley Wayne Dahl is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On May 24, 2023, the Court issued a screening order directing Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading or a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Doc. 15.) Despite being given 21 days within which to file an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal, Plaintiff has failed to do so. II. DISCUSSION A. Legal Standard The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with ……

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.