Ramos

(PC) Trammel v. Ramos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20232:23-cv-01183California343 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMARION TRAMMEL, No. 2:23-cv-1183 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

A. RAMOS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s complaint was filed in the Northern District of California on June 20, 2023 and transferred to this court on June 23, 2023. The court’s own records reveal that on June 9, 2023, plaintiff filed a complaint containing virtually identical allegations against the same defendants. See Trammel v. Ramos, 2:23-cv-1111 AC P. Due to the duplicative nature of the present action, this court will recommend that the complaint be dismissed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 27 1 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.