Uddin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAURICE DARONTE DAVIS, No. 2:22-cv-0864 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MESKATH UDDIN, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants violated his Fourth and Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 25) and motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 26) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will deny both motions without prejudice. I. Motion to Compel Plaintiff states he sent counsel for defendants two sets of interrogatories on April 3, 2023, and April 13, 2023, respectively. (ECF No. 25 at 1.) He states he also sent a motion for intangible things, more than thirty days have passed, and has not received any response. (Id.) Under Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “a party seeking discovery may move for an order compelling an answer,…