(HC) Renteria v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONACIANO ANTONIO RENTERIA, No. 2:22-cv-01376-CKD Petitioner, v. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. 16 Counsel for respondent has filed a request to seal documents pursuant to Local Rule 141. ECF No. 16. The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publ’g Co. v. U.S. Dist. Court for Dist. of Or., 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for the reasons stated in the respondent’s Request, sealing the Request and Appendix pp 54-86 serves a compelling interest. The Court further finds that the compelling interests identified by the respondent would be harmed if the identified documents were not sealed. Finally, the Court finds that there are no available alternatives to sealing the government’s Request and Appendix pp 54-86 that would adequately protect the compelling interests identified by the respondent. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and…