(HC) Renteria v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 5, 20232:22-cv-01376California1,963 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONACIANO ANTONIO RENTERIA, No. 2:22-cv-01376-CKD Petitioner, v. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a federal inmate proceeding through counsel in this habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). See ECF Nos. 9, 12. This habeas corpus action was transferred to this court on July 20, 2022 from the Northern District of California on two claims challenging the application of time credits to petitioner’s sentence. See ECF No. 4 (redacted transfer order). Because petitioner is confined in this judicial district, this court has jurisdiction over the challenges to the execution of his sentence. See Hernandez v. Campbell, 204 F.3d 861, 864-65 (9th Cir. 2000) (holding that “petitions that challenge the manner, location or conditions of a sentence’s execution must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.