(PS) Hill v. City of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARNITHA HILL; TIANA FIELDS; No. 2:22-cv-01625 DJC AC (PS)
ANTHONY GRANDERSON;
BREJONNA GRANDERSON;
MONTREAL GRANDERSON; UNIQUE
FIELDS; MARLO HILL, ORDER and Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO; SGT.
ROBERT HAMM, #3018; OFFICER
ISREAL DELGADO, #358; OFFICER
BRETT MELLOCH, #602; OFFICER
DEREK CALABRESE, #1005; OFFICER
ERIC NEDELJKOVIC; OFFICER
JOSEPH SWALEH, #900, Defendants. 21 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Two motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF No. 16) are before the court: (1) a Motion to Dismiss brought by defendant Officers Hamm, Delgado, Melloch, Calabrese, Nedeljkovic, and Swaleh (ECF No. 19), and (2) a Motion to Dismiss brought by the City of Sacramento (ECF No. 17). Plaintiffs oppose both motions. ECF No. 22. …