Ware

(PC) Thomas v. Ware

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20232:22-cv-00177California585 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL THOMAS, No. 2:22-cv-00177-TLN-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER WARE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 30, 2023, the court ordered plaintiff to serve defendants with supplemental responses to RFP, Set One, on or before May 5, 2023. ECF No. 36 at 3. On April 24, 2023, plaintiff notified the court that he was unable to comply with the court’s order because he did not have access to his C-file. ECF No. 37. He requested a court order directing the warden “to get the documents the defense has requested.” ECF No. 37. On May 15, 2023, however, plaintiff served discovery responses on defendant. ECF No. 38. On this basis, the court finds that plaintiff’s request for a court order is moot. On June 5, 2023, defendants filed a motion to compel plaintiff to respond to their RFP Nos. 8 and 9, which seek information…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.