Diaz
(PC) Montecastro v. Diaz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENDRIX M. MONTECASTRO, Case No. 1: 20-cv-00977-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
v. (Doc. 12) RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Hendrix Montecastro, who is proceeding pro se is a state prisoner who initiated this civil rights action. (See generally Doc. 1.) The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to comply with a Court order and failed to prosecute this matter. (Doc. 12) Specifically, Plaintiff violated Local Rule 183(b) by failing to keep the Court appraised of a current address. (Id.) Thus, the magistrate judge recommended the action be dismissed without prejudice. (Id. at 3.) The Findings and Recommendations were served upon Plaintiff at the address on record on June 12, 2023. It contained a notice that any objections were to be filed within 14 days. (Id. at 3.) In addition, Plaintiff was informed the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of…