Hernandez Gomez v. The GEO Group, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE HERNANDEZ GOMEZ, et al. Case No. 1:22-cv-00868-ADA-CDB
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO STAY
13 v. (Doc. 19)
THE GEO GROUP, INC.
15 Defendant. 90-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant The Geo Group, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) motion to stay (Doc. 19), Plaintiffs Jose Ruben Hernandez Gomez, Salesh Prasad, Guillermo Medina Reyes, Edgar Sanchez, Adan Castillo Merino, Oliva Sierra Ivan, Fidel Garcia, Issac Cardona Hernandez, and Pedro Jesus Figueroa Padilla’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) opposition (Doc. 23), and Defendant’s reply (Doc. 28). For the reasons explained herein, Defendant’s motion to stay shall be granted.1
1 Although the assigned district judge noticed the parties of her intent to decide the motion without oral argument (see Doc. 19), a magistrate judge is authorized to determine motions to stay proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) as long as the resulting order does not…