Hernandez Gomez v. The GEO Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20231:22-cv-00868California2,645 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE HERNANDEZ GOMEZ, et al. Case No. 1:22-cv-00868-ADA-CDB

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO STAY

13 v. (Doc. 19)

THE GEO GROUP, INC.

15 Defendant. 90-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant The Geo Group, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) motion to stay (Doc. 19), Plaintiffs Jose Ruben Hernandez Gomez, Salesh Prasad, Guillermo Medina Reyes, Edgar Sanchez, Adan Castillo Merino, Oliva Sierra Ivan, Fidel Garcia, Issac Cardona Hernandez, and Pedro Jesus Figueroa Padilla’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) opposition (Doc. 23), and Defendant’s reply (Doc. 28). For the reasons explained herein, Defendant’s motion to stay shall be granted.1

1 Although the assigned district judge noticed the parties of her intent to decide the motion without oral argument (see Doc. 19), a magistrate judge is authorized to determine motions to stay proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) as long as the resulting order does not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.