Santoro

(PC) Arrant v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20231:20-cv-01253California1,868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELVIN R. ARRANT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01253-ADA-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. FOR SEVERANCE OF CLAIMS

KELLY SANTORO, et al., (ECF No. 69) Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Melvin R. Arrant is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for severance, filed April 17, 2023. (ECF No. 69.) I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This action is currently proceeding against Defendants Dodson and Garcia for retaliation, against Defendant Florez for excessive force, and against Defendant Tapia for excessive force and retaliation. Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on July 1, 2021. (ECF No. 30.) After an unsuccessful settlement conference, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order on September 17, 2021. (ECF No. 39.) On October 5,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.