Campbell

(HC) Manley v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20232:23-cv-00039California416 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NABIL IBN MANLEY, Case No. 2:23-cv-00039-JDP (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER TAMMY CAMPBELL, Respondent. 16 On February 22, 2023, I screened petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and notified him that it failed to state a viable claim. ECF No. 6. I granted him thirty days to file an amended petition. Id. Petitioner subsequently requested two extensions of time to file an amended petition, both of which I granted. See ECF Nos. 8 & 10. The most recent extension granted petitioner until June 2, 2023, to file an amended petition. To date, petitioner has not filed an amended petition. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for petitioner’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.