(PS) DeCheri Hafer v. Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DECHERI HAFER, No. 2:22-cv-01370-KJM-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ET AL.,

15 Defendant.

17 On April 18, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, ECF No. 12, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. That period having passed, plaintiff has not objected to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned due to insufficient address, plaintiff was properly served. A pro se party has a duty to keep the court apprised of its current address. E.D. Cal. L.R. 183(b). In accordance with Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d…