Regino

Regino v. Staley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20232:23-cv-00032California5,417 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 AURORA REGINO, No. 2:23-cv-00032-JAM-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

SUPERINTENDENT KELLY STALEY, in her official capacity, et al., Defendants. 15 Chico Unified School District (the “District”) Superintendent Kelly Staley (“Defendant”) has filed a motion to dismiss Aurora Regino’s (“Plaintiff”) first amended complaint (“FAC”). See Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 50; FAC, ECF No. 42. Plaintiff has brought the following causes of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendant regarding District Regulation AR 5145.3 (the “Regulation”): (1) facial and as- applied substantive due process; (2) facial and as-applied procedural due process; and (3) facial and as-applied First Amendment familial associations. See FAC. Plaintiff alleges that the Regulation results in the District “socially transitioning” students expressing a transgender identity without notifying and obtaining the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.