Covello

(PC) Rodriguez v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20232:22-cv-00602California439 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 2:22-cv-00602-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER PATRICK COVELLO, et al., Defendants. 16 On December 5, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s amended complaint and notified him that, while some of his claims were cognizable, not all of his claims could proceed in the same action. ECF No. 18. I granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint or an advisement indicating his intent to stand by his current complaint, subject to a recommendation that claims and parties be dismissed. On March 7, 2023, I granted plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time by thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 20. To date, plaintiff has not filed a response to the December 5 order. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.