(PC) Ulrich v. Merced County District Attorney's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20231:23-cv-00612California1,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYNE ULRICH, Case No. 1:23-cv-00612-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT

v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION

MERCED COUNTY DISTRICT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, et al., RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION Defendants. (ECF No. 6)

15 Plaintiff Wayne Ulrich is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the instant action on March 29, 2023. On April 21, 2023, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402.00 filing fee within 45 days. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court’s order and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, on June 15, 2023, Plaintiff was ordered to show cause why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.