Mayorkas

(PS) Qi v. Mayorkas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20232:23-cv-00377California504 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AIAI QI, Case No. 2:23-cv-00377-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Defendants filed a motion dismiss, which was previously noticed for hearing on June 15, 2023. ECF No. 5. After plaintiff failed to timely respond to that motion, I continued the hearing on defendants’ motion and ordered plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to comply with the court’s local rules. ECF No. 7. I also ordered plaintiff file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion by no later than June 30, 2023. Id. In response to that order, plaintiff filed a motion that asked the court to “excuse the delay and accept the late filed Opposition.” ECF No. 8 at 2. Because plaintiff had not filed an opposition, I construed plaintiff’s filing as a motion for an extension of time. ECF No. 9. I granted that motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.