Newsom

(PC) Casto v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20232:19-cv-02209California494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HERSHEL W. CASTO, Case No. 2:19-cv-02209-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 On November 7, 2022, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 53. The court has twice granted plaintiff additional time to file a response to that motion, with the latest deadline being July 3, 2023. See ECF Nos. 56 & 62. To date, plaintiff has not filed a response. In cases in which a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition not more twenty-one days after the date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Id. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.