Clandenin

(PC) Felix v. Clandenin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20231:23-cv-00839California1,097 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT EMERSON FELIX, Case No. 1:23-cv-00839-ADA-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE, DENYING MOTION FOR

COUNSEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND

STEPHANIE CLANDENIN, et al., DENYING MOTION FOR COPY OF LOCAL

RULES

Defendants. (ECF No. 6)

ORDER TO SUBMIT NON-PRISONER

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

19 Plaintiff Scott Emerson Felix (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). On June 5, 2023, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.