Trujillo

Trujillo v. Chaudhary

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20231:22-cv-00969California486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE TRUJILLO, No. 1:22-cv-00969-ADA-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DECLINING

v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER

STATE LAW CLAIMS AND DENYING

HARBIR CHAUDHARY, individually and MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT dba 99 Food Market & Gasoline, et al., WITHOUT PREJUDICE 15 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 11, 16) 16 Plaintiff Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action on August 3, 2022, against Defendants Harbir Chaudhary and Ved Vati Chaudhary (aka Ved Vati Rana), both individually and doing business as 99 Food Market & Gasoline (“Defendants”), alleging claims under the American with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), and California’s Health and Safety Code. (ECF No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 20, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.