Messer

(PC) Barrett v. Messer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20231:20-cv-01313California2,333 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUN MICHAEL BARRETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01313-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL

v.

M. MESSER, et al., ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF

TIME WITHIN WHICH TO OPPOSE

Defendants. MOTIONS TO DISMISS

(Doc. 38)

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO

SHOW CAUSE

19 Plaintiff Shaun Michael Barrett is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On May 22, 2023, the Defendants filed motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. (Docs. 31 & 32.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff’s oppositions or statements of non-opposition to the motions were to be filed “not more than twenty-one (21) days after the date of service of the motion.” Plaintiff filed neither oppositions nor statements of non- opposition. On June 27, 2023, the Court issued its Order To…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.