Rodriguez

(PC) Martinez v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20231:21-cv-01495California4,529 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD F. MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-01495-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER REQUIRING

RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF

v. (Doc. 1) C. RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION REQUESTING THE COURT TO

SCREEN THE COMPLAINT FILED

OCTOBER 7, 2021

19 (Doc. 30)

20 Plaintiff Ronald F. Martinez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which can be granted. Because Plaintiff may be able to cure the deficiencies identified herein, the Court shall extend to Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.