Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. County of San Joaquin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20232:16-cv-00770California4,533 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

VICTOR RODRIGUEZ,

No. 2:16-cv-00770-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER

14 COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN by and 15 through the SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, et al.,

Defendants.

18 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants County of San Joaquin through San Joaquin County Human Services Agency (“HSA”) and Stephanie Evans’s (“Evans”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff Victor Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 39.) Defendants replied. (ECF No. 41.) Having carefully considered the briefing filed by both parties and for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. /// 26 Plaintiff untimely filed his opposition. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (An opposition “shall be filed and served not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed (or continued) hearing date .... A failure to file a timely opposition may also be construed by the Court as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.