Messer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUN MICHAEL BARRETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01313-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTS FOR

v. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

M. MESSER, et al., (Doc. 38)

Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

16 Plaintiff Shaun Michael Barrett is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELELVANT BACKGROUND On May 22, 2023, the Defendants filed motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. (Docs. 31 & 32.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff’s oppositions or statements of non-opposition to the motions were to be filed “not more than twenty-one (21) days after the date of service of the motion.” Plaintiff filed neither oppositions nor statements of non- opposition. On June 27, 2023, the Court issued its Order To Show Cause (OSC) In Writing Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed For Failure…