Jenkins

Jenkins v. City of Vallejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20232:19-cv-01896California4,243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

DEYANA JENKINS, No. 2:19-cv-01896-TLN-DB

Plaintiff,

ORDER v. 14 CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal corporation; ANDREW BIDOU, in his individual capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF VALLEJO; COLIN EATON, in his individual capacity as Police Officer for the CITY OF VALLEJO; JORDON PATZER, in his individual capacity as Police Officer for the CITY OF VALLEJO, and DOES 1-50, inclusive.

Defendants.

21 This matter is before the Court on Defendants City of Vallejo (“City”), Andrew Bidou (“Bidou”), Colin Eaton (“Eaton”), and Jordon Patzer’s (“Patzer”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss/Strike. (ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff Deyana Jenkins (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 40.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 42.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES in part and GRANTS in part Defendants’ motion. /// 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case arises from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.