Pulido-Esparza

(PC) Spencer v. Pulido-Esparza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20231:20-cv-01176California1,601 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD B. SPENCER, 1:20-cv-01176-JLT-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

DISQUALIFICATION OF MAGISTRATE

vs. JUDGE

PULIDO-ESPARZA, et al., (ECF No. 21.)

Defendants.

19 I. BACKGROUND Edward B. Spencer (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 20, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On November 5, 2021, the Court dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 10.) On December 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint naming as defendants Correctional Officer L. Pulido-Esparza, Lieutenant C. Smith (Hearing Officer), Stuart Sherman (Warden), and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) (collectively, “Defendants”). (ECF No. 13.) On May 10, 2023, the Court issued findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.