(PS) Tubbs v. California Baptist University

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20232:22-cv-01913California363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK TUBBS, No. 2:22-cv-01913-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,

et al., Defendants. 17 On June 9, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.1 /// /// /// /// 25 26 Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.