Hunt
(PC) Braden v. Hunt
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL W. BRADEN, No. 1:23-cv-00469-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
v. TO THIS ACTION K. HUNT, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF No. 19) 17 Plaintiff Paul W. Braden is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 28, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and found that he stated cognizable a cognizable Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that Plaintiff has stated a cognizable excessive force claim against Defendants Duran, Kiester, Diaz, and Vieth. (ECF No. 18.) However, Plaintiff failed to state any other cognizable claims. Plaintiff was granted the opportunity to file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed on…