(PC) Murillo v. District Attorney Office
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CIXTO CRUZ MURILLO, Case No. 2:22-cv-01920-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, et al., Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings this § 1983 case against a district attorney’s office, warden Patrick Carvello, sergeant Canella, and officer Mosqueda. ECF No. 19. His allegations are insufficient, however. I will give plaintiff one final opportunity amend before recommending that this action be dismissed. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. 28 A complaint must contain a short and plain…