Moore

(PC) Huff v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20231:19-cv-01248California555 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORDAN HUFF, Case No. 1:19-cv-01248-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE LIMITED SURREPLY

v. AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE SURREPLY

T. MOORE, A. MATEVOUSIAN, S. LAKES, and FNU HESS, (Doc. No. 52) 15 Defendants. AUGUST 3, 2023 DEADLINE 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a surreply, filed on July 11, 2023. (Doc. No. 52, “Motion”). Plaintiff seeks permission and 10 days to file a surreply not to exceed five pages in length. (Id. at 2 ¶ 7). Parties do not have the right to file surreplies and motions are deemed submitted when the time to reply has expired. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(l); see also Garcia v. Biter, 195 F. Supp.3d at 1131, 1133 (E.D. Cal. July 18, 2016). The Court generally views motions for leave to file a surreply with disfavor. Id. (citing U.S. ex rel. Meyer v. Horizon Health Corp., 565 F.3d 1195,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.