Clendenin

(PC) Drake v. Clendenin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20231:22-cv-01165California7,660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 SAM DRAKE, Case No. 1:22-cv-01165-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS STEPHANIE CLENDIN, et al., AGAINST DEFENDANTS CLENDENIN AND KISHAN THAT THEY SUBJECTED Defendants.

PLAINTIFF TO PUNISHMENT IN

VIOLATION OF THE DUE PROCESS

CLAUSE (CLAIM 1 AND CLAIM 2);

PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM AGAINST

DEFENDANT CLENDENIN THAT SHE

FAILED TO PROVIDE PLAINTIFF WITH

RESTORATIVE MENTAL HEALTH

TREATMENT IN VIOLATION OF THE

FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT (CLAIM 3);

AND PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANTS CLENDENIN AND

KISHAN THAT CALIFORNIA WELFARE

AND INSTITUTIONS CODE SECTION 7301 IS AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL BILL

OF ATTAINDER (CLAIM 4); AND THAT

ALL OTHER CLAIMS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.