Wince

Wince v. PG&E

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20232:23-cv-00385California2,197 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LATASHA M. WINCE, No. 2:23-cv-00385-MCE-JDP Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On January 18, 2023, Plaintiff Latasha M. Wince (“Plaintiff”) filed her Complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, against her former employer Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“PG&E”) and supervisor Janae Valencia (“Valencia”) (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging the following causes of action: (1) Race Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation in Violation of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act, California Government Code §§ 12940 et seq. (“FEHA”), against Defendants; (2) Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy against PG&E; (3) Failure to Take All Reasonable and Necessary Steps to Prevent and Correct Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation in Violation of FEHA against PG&E; and (4) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (“IIED”) against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.