(PS) White v. City and County of West Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20232:20-cv-02383California2,154 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBBIE D. WHITE, No. 2:20-cv-02383 TLN AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER and CITY AND COUNTY OF WEST FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 This civil rights action was removed to federal court on December 1, 2020. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff is now proceeding in pro se following the withdrawal of his attorney. ECF No. 32. Pre- trial proceedings were accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). ECF No. 34. This case has a long procedural history, including various periods in which plaintiff was proceeding in pro se and other periods in which plaintiff was represented by counsel. Plaintiff is currently proceeding in pro se. ECF No. 105. The operative complaint is the Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 53. Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 104) and a motion to change venue (ECF No. 110). For the reasons set forth below, each of these motions must be denied.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.