Hardesty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Joseph Hardesty, et al., No. 2:10-cv-02414-KJM-KJN Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, et al., Defendants. 17 In advance of the retrial on damages in this case, the Hardestys have filed one motion in 19 Jimine and the County has filed nine motions in /imine. The parties have filed a stipulation 20 resolving the Hardestys’ motion and the County’s fifth motion in full and the County’s seventh motion in part. See Stip., ECF No. 700. The County has withdrawn its eighth motion. See id. On June 30, 2023, the court held a hearing on the remaining motions and denied the County’s 23 second motion without prejudice and granted the seventh motion without prejudice for reasons 24 stated on the record. See Mins. Hr’g, ECF No. 707. The court resolves defendants’ remaining 25 five motions here. 26 I. COUNTY’S FIRST MOTION The County moves…