Block

Block v. Salem

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20231:22-cv-01596California4,771 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:22-cv-01596-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Doc. 14) MOHAMED NASSER SALEM, FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE individually and dba QUICK MART, 15 Defendant.

17 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Hendrik Block’s motion for default judgment against Defendant Mohamed Nasser Salem, individually and dba Quick Mart, which was filed on June 2, 2023. (Doc. 14.) The motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Defendant did not file an opposition to the motion, and the time in which to do so has passed. L.R. 230(c) (“Opposition . . . to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the motion was filed”.) On June 21, 2023, the Court vacated the hearing on this matter and directed Plaintiff to file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.