Hatton

(HC) Bernik v. Hatton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20232:17-cv-02348California12,461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREY BERNIK, No. 2:17-cv-2348 DAD AC Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SHAWN HATTON, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a California state prisoner proceeding through counsel with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The action proceeds on the original petition, ECF No. 1, which challenges petitioner’s 2011 conviction for second degree murder. Respondent has answered, ECF No. 11, and petitioner filed a traverse, ECF No. 22-1. BACKGROUND I. Proceedings in the Trial Court A. The Evidence Presented at Trial The jury heard evidence of the following facts. Stephan Bernik owned a landscaping business. He negotiated to sell the business to Valeriy Pishtoy and accepted a deposit from him. The two could not reach agreement, however, and Pishtoy asked for his deposit back. They both 27 This statement of facts is adapted from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.