(HC) Johnson v. St. Andle
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCUS D. JOHNSON, No. 2:22-cv-1412 TLN AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
ST. ANDLE, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I. Procedural History By order filed January 9, 2023, the undersigned screened the petition and, after finding that it did not state any cognizable claims for relief, granted petitioner leave to file an amended petition. ECF No. 7. After petitioner failed to file an amended petition within the time for doing so, he was given a final opportunity to amend the petition. ECF No. 8. Petitioner’s first amended petition was received by the court on March 15, 2023. ECF No. 9. The first amended petition also failed to state a cognizable habeas claim and it was recommended that the petition be dismissed without further leave to amend. ECF No. 10. Before the district…