Gomez
(PC) Emasealu v. Gomez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOM INEZE EMASEALU, Case No. 1:22-cv-01326-HBK (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY
FILING FEE OR FILE UPDATED
v. FINANCIAL INFORMATION J. GOMEZ, K. HART, ARVIZA, AND AUGUST 17, 2023 DEADLINE
MOORE,
15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Tom Ineze Emasealu, who is proceeding pro se, has filed a notice of change of address reflecting that he has been released from detention. (See Doc. No. 8). Because Plaintiff initiated this action while a prisoner and was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (Doc. No. 7), he is “required to pay the full amount of a filing fee” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”). 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Based on Plaintiff’s
1 The Court independently has confirmed that Plaintiff, who was formerly identified as Tom Ineze Emasealu, Inmate No. 80908-379, is no longer in BOP custody. See United States v. Basher, 629 F.3d 1161, 1165 (9th Cir. 2011) (taking…