Dayson

(PC) Fratus v. Dayson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20232:20-cv-00354California1,037 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN FRATUS, No. 2:20-cv-0354 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAYSON, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that he suffered side effects from psychiatric medication and was denied medical treatment. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time and request for an order directing the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to give plaintiff his legal property. Plaintiff requests and extension of time for all current deadlines in this case. (ECF No. 94 at 1.) In support of the motion, plaintiff states that on March 22, 2023, he was involuntarily moved from Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) to California State Prison, Corcoran (“CSP-COR”) to “attend a court hearing for a 5 year old criminal case at Kings County Superior Court.” …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.