Oboyle

(PC) Escamilla v. Oboyle

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20232:22-cv-02038California2,611 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON MIGUEL ESCAMILLA, No. 2:22-cv-2038 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. OBOYLE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court are defendants’ motion to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project and plaintiff’s second amended complaint.1 I. Motion to Opt Out of the Post-Screening ADR Project By order filed February 10, 2023, this case was referred to the court’s Post-Screening ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Project and stayed for a period of 120 days. ECF No. 27. That order provided defendants the opportunity to request opting out of the ADR Project based on a good faith belief that a settlement conference would be a waste of resources. Id. at 2. Defendants received several extensions of time to request leave to opt out of the ADR Project and

Plaintiff was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.