Oboyle
(PC) Escamilla v. Oboyle
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON MIGUEL ESCAMILLA, No. 2:22-cv-2038 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. OBOYLE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court are defendants’ motion to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project and plaintiff’s second amended complaint.1 I. Motion to Opt Out of the Post-Screening ADR Project By order filed February 10, 2023, this case was referred to the court’s Post-Screening ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Project and stayed for a period of 120 days. ECF No. 27. That order provided defendants the opportunity to request opting out of the ADR Project based on a good faith belief that a settlement conference would be a waste of resources. Id. at 2. Defendants received several extensions of time to request leave to opt out of the ADR Project and