Singh

Singh v. Jaddou

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20232:23-cv-00297California472 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KULDEEP SINGH, No. 2:23-cv-00297 AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UR M. JADDOU, DIRECTOR, USCIS, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 This action has been assigned to the Magistrate Judge under the court’s automated case assignment plan. See Local Rules, Appendix A, subsection (m). Pursuant to the Local Rule and the Civil Case Documents issued in this case (ECF No. 3) the parties were required to return the “CONSENT / DECLINE OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION” form to the Clerk within 90 days from the date the action was filed, or within 14 days of removal from state court. ECF No. 3 at 2. Plaintiff did not file the required forms, or make any filing in this case, and on June 2, 2023, the undersigned issued an order to show cause within 10 days why sanctions should not issue. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff did not respond. On June 26, 2023, the court issued a second order to show cause noting that plaintiff had not complied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.