(SS) Ness v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20232:20-cv-00309California4,991 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LAURA L. NESS, Case No. 2:20-cv-00309-JDP Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff challenges the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration partially denying her claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. In her motion for summary judgment, plaintiff argues that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred by determining that plaintiff was no longer disabled as of March 29, 2018. ECF No. 17. The Commissioner has filed a motion to remand that concedes error in the ALJ’s decision but requests that this court remand to the ALJ for additional administrative proceedings. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff opposes that motion and asks that the case be remanded for an award of benefits. ECF No. 21. For the following reasons, I will grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, deny the Commissioner’s motion, and remand the case 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.