(PC) Cortez v. Sacramento State Prison Officer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20232:23-cv-00170California281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERICK CORTEZ, No. 2:23-cv-00170-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND SACRAMENTO STATE PRISON FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

OFFICER,

15 Defendant.

17 By order filed June 5, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to 18 file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and 19 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this 21 matter to a district court judge. 22 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court and serve a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.