Edwards

(PC) Delphin v. Edwards

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20232:23-cv-00493California2,485 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEREMY DELPHIN, No. 2:23-cv-0493 KJM DB P Plaintiff,

ORDER EDWARDS, et al. 14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants used excessive force, failed to submit his grievance, and lost his property. Before the court are plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief and for the appointment of counsel and plaintiff’s first amended complaint for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court will order a response from the prison regarding plaintiff’s allegations in his motions for preliminary injunctive relief and will deny the motion for appointment of counsel. Further, this court finds that plaintiff has stated some claims in his first amended complaint that are potentially cognizable under §1983 and fails to state other claims. Plaintiff will be given the opportunity to proceed on the claims found potentially cognizable herein…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.