Warden

(HC) Kerr v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20232:23-cv-01148California792 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORMAN ALAN KERR, Case No. 2:23-cv-01148-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v.

WARDEN, Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a federal prisoner without counsel, brings this action pursuant to section 2241 and challenges a conviction that was handed down in the Middle District of North Carolina. ECF No. 1 at 1. He brings this section 2241 action alleging both that he is actually innocent and that his enhancement under section 922(g)(1) is invalid. Id. at 1; ECF No. 2 at 1-2. I recommend that his petition be denied. I will grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, and deny his petition for electronic filing, ECF No. 5 as moot. Finally, petitioner has also filed a motion to amend, ECF No. 6, which, after review, I construe as a motion to expedite and will also deny as moot. Petitioner argues that he is entitled to proceed under section 2241’s “escape hatch” because he is actually innocent.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.