Culum

(PC) Montgomery v. Culum

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20232:22-cv-01156California1,116 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DWAYNE MONTGOMERY, No. 2: 22-cv-1156 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. CULUM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are defendants’ motion to opt out of the Post- Screening ADR Project and defendants’ unopposed motion to stay this action. (ECF No. 24.) For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ motions are granted. Motion to Opt Out On May 18, 2023, the undersigned referred this action to the Post-Screening ADR Project and stayed this action for 120 days. (ECF No. 23.) Defendants now move to opt out of the Post- Screening ADR Project. (ECF No. 24.) Good cause appearing, defendants’ motion is granted. Motion to Stay This action proceeds on plaintiff’s amended complaint against defendant Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”) Correctional Officers Culum, Gamez, Pesce, Kelly, Mott,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.