Fox

Fox v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20231:22-cv-01197California278 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RICK D. FOX, Case No. 1:22-cv-01197-ADA-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TERMINATE TRANS UNION, LLC, v. AS DEFENDANT IN THIS ACTION 14 EXPERIAN INFORMATION (ECF No. 41) 15 SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 On July 18, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal of Defendant Trans Union, LLC, only. (ECF No. 41.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 687 (9th Cir. 2005) (The Ninth Circuit has “only extended the rule to allow the dismissal of all claims against one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.