Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAIFUSIN CHIU, No. 2:23–cv–1053–KJM–KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. UNKNOWN, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding without the assistance of counsel, filed a complaint against an unknown defendant; plaintiff also requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See ECF Nos. 1, 2.) The court granted plaintiff’s IFP request and dismissed the complaint, finding it failed to state a claim, failed to provide a short and plain statement of the court’s jurisdiction and relief sought, and finding it frivolous on its face. (ECF No. 3.) Given that the court could not say whether no claim could be stated, plaintiff was given 28 days to amend the complaint and was warned that failure to do so by the required deadline could result in sanctions, including “dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).” (Id. at 5.) That deadline has passed with no filings from plaintiff. Accordingly,…