Cloak

(PC) Davis, Sr. v. Cloak

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20231:22-cv-01632California566 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARL DAVIS SR., Case No. 1:22-cv-01632-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. AUGUST 7, 2023, DEADLINE PATRICK EATON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Earl Davis Sr., a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights 17 complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 22, 2022. (Doc. No. 1). On March 6, 2023, the 18 undersigned screened Plaintiff’s Complaint and found it failed to state a claim. (Doc. No. 11). 19 Plaintiff timely filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”). (Doc. No. 14). On June 6, 2023, the 20 undersigned screened the FAC and found it stated cognizable First Amendment retaliation and 21 interference with mail claims against Defendants E. Cloak, S. Reed, and R. Vincent, but failed to 22 state any other cognizable claims. (Doc. No. 26 at 1). 23 Plaintiff was given three options to exercise within twenty-one (21) days from receipt of 24 the June 6, 2023 Order: (1) file a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”); (2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.