Davis

Davis v. Advance Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20232:22-cv-00343California4,121 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURIEL DAVIS, No. 2:22-cv-00343-MCE-JDP Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADVANCE SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 Presently before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Duriel Davis’ (“Plaintiff”) Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)1 filed by the following groups of Defendants: (1) Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, ADM Rice, Inc., and ADM Milling Company (collectively, “ADM Corporate Defendants”); (2) Janet Escalante (erroneously sued as Janette Escalante), Matthew House, and Johnny Barnett (collectively, the “Individual Managers”); and (3) Carlos Guerrero (“Guerrero”) (erroneously sued as Carlos Guerrera) (collectively with ADM Corporate Defendants and Individual Managers, “Moving Defendants”). ECF Nos. 32 (“Moving Defs.’ Mot.”), ///

26 1 All further references to “Rule” or “Rules” are to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2 Defendant Advance Services, Inc. (“Advance”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.