Campbell

(PC) Medina v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20231:23-cv-00381California416 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CESARIO VIZCARRA MEDINA, Case No. 1:23-cv-00381-ADA-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND,

AND PLAINTIFF TO COMPLETE, A § 1983

TAMMY CAMPBELL, CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT FORM Defendant. (ECF No. 1) 15 16 Plaintiff Cesario Vizcarra Medina filed this case as a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1, see ECF No. 5 – amended petition). Concluding that Plaintiff’s claims regarding his conditions of confinement were not cognizable in habeas, the Court issued findings and recommendations to dismiss Plaintiff’s operative petition. (ECF No. 7). After Plaintiff filed objections requesting that his petition be converted to a 42 U.S.C. 21 § 1983 civil rights action, the Court vacated its findings and recommendations, converted the case 22 to a § 1983 action, and directed Plaintiff to complete an in forma pauperis application or pay the 23 civil filing fee. (ECF No. 9). On July 19, 2023, Plaintiff paid the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.